Думаю несложно зайти на сайт х2н и почитать его отличия от хм2 и пт4, но люди заходят в раздел цена и закрывают сайт.
Leo_Manowar | 68 |
Kaktus26rus | 42 |
allianze | 41 |
Noooob25 | 40 |
vitja11111 | 39 |
Цитата
Tankograd, в H2N, имея достаточно рук, можно посмотреть по какому префлоп-чартику катает опп:)
Цитата (Lorem @ 13.9.2018)
раз уж меня спрашивают в личке про ссылку на статью Юдковского (хотя это не его статья, просто с сайте lesswrong и то русскоязычного, попутал), которую я упомянул на эфире, то сразу дам ссылку здесь - тыц
Цитата
Let’s say Wanda’s Widgets has one million customers. Each customer pays it $100 per year, for a total income of $100 million. Each customer prefers Wanda to her competitor Wayland, who charges $150 for widgets of equal quality. Now let’s say Wanda’s Widgets does some unspeakably horrible act which makes it $10 million per year, but offends every one of its million customers.
There is no incentive for a single customer to boycott Wanda’s Widgets. After all, that customer’s boycott will cost the customer $50 (she will have to switch to Wayland) and make an insignificant difference to Wanda (who is still earning $99,999,900 of her original hundred million). The customer takes significant inconvenience, and Wanda neither cares nor stops doing her unspeakably horrible act (after all, it’s giving her $10 million per year, and only losing her $100).
The only reason it would be in a customer’s interests to boycott is if she believed over a hundred thousand other customers would join her. In that case, the boycott would be costing Wanda more than the $10 million she gains from her unspeakably horrible act, and it’s now in her self-interest to stop committing the act. However, unless each boycotter believes 99,999 others will join her, she is inconveniencing herself for no benefit.
Furthermore, if a customer offended by Wanda’s actions believes 100,000 others will boycott Wanda, then it’s in the customer’s self-interest to “defect” from the boycott and buy Wanda’s products. After all, the customer will lose money if she buys Wayland’s more expensive widgets, and this is unnecessary – the 100,000 other boycotters will change Wanda’s mind with or without her participation.
This suggests a “market failure” of boycotts, which seems confirmed by experience. We know that, despite many companies doing very controversial things, there have been very few successful boycotts. Indeed, few boycotts, successful or otherwise, ever make the news, and the number of successful boycotts seems much less than the amount of outrage expressed at companies’ actions.
Цитата
The existence of government regulation solves this problem nicely. If >51% of people disagree with Wanda’s unspeakably horrible act, they don’t need to waste time and money guessing how many of them will join in a boycott, and they don’t need to worry about being unable to conscript enough defectors to reach critical mass. They simply vote to pass a law banning the action.
Цитата (MCTrap @ 17.9.2018)
Сейчас дела обстоят так, что даже если ты просто хочешь играть в покер - тебя обязательно этому обучат, и даже насильно. Если брать школы, то скинут чарты, и уже завтра даже полный новичок будет играть крепкий постфлоп .
Цитата
И он будет выдавать отличные от хрк цифры?